EPL Masters 2026

Team Lynx vs HULIGANI

Team Lynx

Live

40:28

Dire leads by 35.1k gold

Feed 15 min behind the game

HULIGANI

Watch

Live Twitch streams whose titles mention these teams, this league or its pros. We match titles, so a stream may be showing another game.

ya4ILLER · 1,004 watching · RU
[БЕЗ ЗАДЕРЖКИ] HULIGANI vs Lynx | EPL MASTERS 3 | @ya4iller !TG !BC !Розыгрыш
betbist · 112 watching · RU
HULIGANI vs Team Lynx EPL Masters III @betbist
rakuzan777 · 103 watching · UK
EPL Masters III | Lynx | 0 : 1 | huligani| Bo3
aelnis · 167 watching · UK
[UA\EN] EPL Masters III | Team Lynx | 0 : 1 | хулігани | Bo3 w/ @rakuzan777 !збір !сітка !король

In the Dota 2 client, league games are under Watch → Live.

Team Lynx

htiviy_vladikPangolier
QBFYHoodwink
mellojulEarth Spirit
v1olent–Nature's Prophet
krekerMirana

HULIGANI

naive-Lone Druid
ReinDazzle
elmo^^Timbersaw
queezyDark Willow
Mirage`雨Slardar

The draft

The draft favours HULIGANI (58%). HULIGANI is ahead, as the draft suggested.

Team Lynx: C 54/100

Lanes F: −4.8 points per lane (3 from pro lane results).
Counters C: +0.9 points per hero against the enemy lineup.
Composition A: All 6 covered.
Hero strength F: −2.0 points per hero versus an even win rate this patch.
Positions A: Every hero is at a position the pros often play it (54% typical).
Combos C: +1.0 points per pair across 9 pro pairings.

HULIGANI: B 62/100

Lanes B: +4.8 points per lane (3 from pro lane results).
Counters D: −0.3 points per hero against the enemy lineup.
Composition A: All 6 covered.
Hero strength D: −1.1 points per hero versus an even win rate this patch.
Positions A: Every hero is at a position the pros often play it (79% typical).
Combos B: +1.7 points per pair across 6 pro pairings.

Nature's Prophet is a strong answer to Dark Willow (+7.6 points).
Dire has the stronger heroes this patch (3.2 points of win rate).
Radiant wins the head-to-head matchups (1.5 points).
Dark Willow is a tournament priority: picked or banned in 80% of recent pro drafts.

Estimated from the draft alone, with the same data and report card as the draft trainer. It picked the winner 57% of the time on recent high-rank games it hadn't seen, so treat it as a read, not a prediction.